A dream is usually described as something we want to achieve. Yet that definition already assumes desire is self born. A dream house, a dream job, a dream life or a dream car, these phrases sound personal, but they often enter our minds already defined, before we ever stop to ask where they began. Society treats dreams as necessities suggesting that without a clearly defined goal a life loses direction. From a young age we are told that dreaming big is proof of seriousness and that effort gains meaning only when it points toward a visible destination. A dream loses its meaning the moment we stop asking whether it is truly ours.
Most people believe they own their dreams, yet very few are born in solitude. They take shape through comparison, when someone else’s achievement or lifestyle becomes a reference point for success. What begins as observation turns into desire, and desire slowly turns into obligation, until the goal feels personal even though its roots lie elsewhere. Over time admiration becomes longing, longing becomes identity, and the line between what we genuinely want and what we are expected to want fades. The issue is not ambition itself but the ease with which influence is mistaken for intention, because many dreams reveal more about the world that shaped them than about the individual who they are.
There are two dominant forces that shape most ambitions. One is social expectation, a rulebook that defines what success should look like at a certain age or stage of life. The other is comparison, the discomfort of seeing others possess things we do not, whether status, comfort, recognition or freedom. Together these forces create a powerful illusion of choice. A person feels driven yet the direction is already decided. The dream then becomes less about fulfillment and more about catching up or proving worth.
This is where conflict begins. Chasing a dream that did not rise from within creates constant tussle. Effort feels heavy. Progress feels insufficient. Even achievement feels hollow. Reaching the goal does not always bring the sense of completion it promises. This is not a lack of discipline but a conflict between effort and desire. A borrowed dream demands borrowed motivation and borrowed motivation rarely sustains a life.
There is also an assumption that dreams give life meaning, yet many of us discover that even after achieving what we once longed for, the sense of arrival is very short. Satisfaction fades quickly and a new target replaces the old one. The structure remains the same, only the object changes. This constant forward pull leaves little room to ask whether the journey itself is aligned with who one is, rather than who one is trying to become.
The idea that everyone must have a dream assumes that value comes from projection rather than presence. This belief keeps people chasing an imagined version of themselves while neglecting the person they already are. A dream can give direction but it can also distract from listening to oneself.
This does not mean dreams are useless or harmful by nature. A dream that arises from genuine curiosity, from an inner pull rather than external comparison can be energising and sustaining. The difference lies in ownership. A dream that belongs to you does not ask for constant justification and does not collapse your sense of worth when it is delayed. It leaves space for change and does not punish rest.
So the question is not whether a person should have a dream, but whether the dream allows the person to remain human. Does it permit doubt, slowness and growth, or does it turn life to a checklist of achievements. When dreams become identities, life narrows. When they remain flexible, life expands.
Perhaps the most honest way to live is not to abandon dreams entirely, but to loosen their grip. To treat them as possibilities rather than definitions. To let life progress without comparing every moment to a future that exists only in the mind. In doing so, Dream becomes a choice rather than a burden.
No comments:
Post a Comment